Introduction to Bayesian Epistemology
نویسنده
چکیده
1. Deriving Bayes' Theorem Bayes' theorem is a piece of mathematics. It is called a theorem because it is derivable from a simple definition in probability theory. As a piece of mathematics, it is not controversial. Bayesianism, on the other hand, is a controversial philosophical theory in epistemology. It proposes that the mathematics of probability theory can be put to work in explicating various concepts connected with issues about evidence and confirmation. Before I make an observation, I assign a probability to the hypothesis H; this probability may be high, medium, or low. After I make the observation, thereby learning that some observation statement O is true, I want to update the probability I assigned to H, to take account of what I have just learned. The probability that H has before the observation is called its prior probability; it is represented by Pr(H). The probability that H has in the light of the observation O is called its posterior probability; it is represented by the conditional probability Pr(H*O) (read this as " the probability of H, given O "). Bayes' theorem shows how the prior and the posterior probability are related. This definition is intuitive. What is the probability that a card drawn at random from a standard deck is a heart, given that it is red? Well, the probability that it is a red heart is 1/4; the probability that it is red is ½. Thus, the answer is: ½. By switching A's and B's with each other, it will also be true that Pr(B*A) = Pr(A&B)/Pr(A). These two expressions allow the probability of the conjunction (A&B) to be expressed in two different ways:
منابع مشابه
Bayesian Epistemology
Bayesian epistemology addresses epistemological problems with the help of the mathematical theory of probability. It turns out that the probability calculus is especially suited to represent degrees of belief (credences) and to deal with questions of belief change, confirmation, evidence, justification, and coherence. Compared to the informal discussions in traditional epistemology, Bayesian ep...
متن کاملProblems for Bayesian Epistemology
In the past, few mainstream epistemologists have endorsed Bayesian epistemology, feeling that it fails to capture the complex structure of epistemic cognition. The defenders of Bayesian epistemology have tended to be probability theorists rather than epistemologists, and I have always suspected they were more attracted by its mathematical elegance than its epistemological realism. But recently ...
متن کاملPollock on Probability in Epistemology
John Pollock did a lot of interesting and important work on the metaphysics and epistemology of probability over several decades. In Thinking About Acting [15], we find many fascinating and thought provoking ideas and arguments (both old and new) about probability. Owing to limitations of space, I will be confining my remarks to a handful of issues addressed in [15] pertaining to probability, l...
متن کاملEvidential Probability and Objective Bayesian Epistemology
In this chapter we draw connections between two seemingly opposing approaches to probability and statistics: evidential probability on the one hand and objective Bayesian epistemology on the other.
متن کاملBayesian Networks in Philosophy
There is a long philosophical tradition of addressing questions in philosophy of science and epistemology by means of the tools of Bayesian probability theory (see Earman (1992) and Howson and Urbach (1993)). In the late '70s, an axiomatic approach to conditional independence was developed within a Bayesian framework. This approach in conjunction with developments in graph theory are the two pi...
متن کاملObjective Bayesian Epistemology for Inductive Logic on Predicate Languages
Main Objective. The main aim of this work is to provide a new justification of the three norms of objective Bayesian epistemology: that degrees of belief should be (i) probabilities, (ii) calibrated to evidence of physical probabilities, and (iii) sufficiently equivocal or non-extreme. While these norms are typically each justified in different ways, it is shown that they can be given a unified...
متن کامل